Sarasota County Commissioners
In January 2018, the Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners were fully aware of Harvey Ayers who is their subordinate, through a package with a red binder detailing all of Harvey Ayer's repugnant history. They were fully aware of his past and current behavior, yet, they have done nothing, Sarasota County deserves better! Much Better! #METOO
The liability and dangers of Harvey Ayers towards the citizens of Sarasota County are real.
On April 23, 2019, they were given the same package and a 3 minute on the record statement regarding Harvey Ayers.
Sarasota County Commissioners Photo
Harvey Ayers is "Sarasota County's Poster Child, …their Representative:"
Harvey Ayers Tyranny2
On April 23, 2019, Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners were AGAIN informed of this bully and it was recorded to open session. Let's see if they continue to circle the wagon and protect this dangerous individual at the risk of the citizens of Sarasota County.
HARVEY AYERS, HISTORY:

FDLE - Florida Department of Law Enforcement Global Profile Sheet states about Harvey Ayers:
NO MORAL CHARACTER”…
FDLE Harvey Ayers
What is contained herein is incredible true and factual information about Sarasota County employee Harvey Ayers. This story defies comprehension, but is completely true. Yet, most troubling is how Sarasota County Government seems to condone and continue to support this former disgraced police officer that has been working for Sarasota County; even after they knew about his past through public records and employment records they obtained which revealed much of what is contained herein. Shocking to say the least! There have been many complaints, Sarasota County Government and the Sarasota County Commissioners seem to not care, even after they have been informed of current complaints by citizens and myself. READ ON…
Injustice Meg Wittmer Sarasota County
While working a Desoto County as a Deputy, the records found on Harvey Ayers reveal allegations of sexual assault: "He pulls her arms above her head and holds them there with one hand while he pulls her shorts and underwear down with his other hand and with his leg pushed her shorts and underwear completely off. He then climbs between her legs and penetrates her she is telling him no… She is "freaking out" crying and scared… Ayers then withdraws his penis from her and ejaculates in his hand." See the full report further down…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault Excerpt
City of Punta Gorda Police Department public records show Professional Standards Investigation of Harvey Ayers for Sexual Relations while on Duty Yes, you read that correctly…
Harvey Ayers MUST GO PETITION
Harvey Ayers for Sexual Relations while on Duty
Harvey Ayers
City of Punta Gorda Police Department records show allegations of false and wrongful arrest, endangerment, defamation of character, lying on arrest reports, physical harm and disrespect by Harvey Ayers.
False and wrongful arrest, endangerment, defamation of character, lying on arrest reports, physical harm and disrespect by Harvey Ayers.
SARASOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INTEGRITY
In 2/8/96 Harvey Ayers Pleaded Guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident with damage.
Harvey Ayers Pleaded Guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident with damage.
Harvey Ayers Always Been2
From 1998 until 2003 Harvey Ayers was a sworn Desoto County Sheriff’s Deputy. Public Records obtained from that agency revealed:

Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault and lewd behavior with a female student attending a domestic violence class where Harvey Ayers was the instructor; accused Ayers of forcing himself on her and masturbating and then ejaculating in his hand. “Reported to Sheriff… she was sexually battered by Deputy Ayers
Harvey Ayers Rape
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INVEST1GATIVE REPORT
On January 23, 2002 at approximately 13 20 hours SA Herndon and net Lewis of the DeSoto County Sheriffs Office continued the interview of _____ at residence at 2105 SE Airport Estates St Arcadia. ________ is the victim in the alleged
forced sexual incident between and Deputy Harvey John Ayers of the DeSoto County Sheriffs Office
continue to state the same exact statement that she gave the investigators the night before concerning the events of September 17, 2001. ________ sits on an ottoman in the living room while Ayers goes to the bedroom to change clothes After several minutes she hears him call out to her and she approaches the bedroom door which is cracked open and pushes the door open and he request that she enter She opens the door and sees
Ayers standing there "naked" He grabs her and hugs and kisses on her and she tries to push away but he puts her on the bed. He pulls her arms above her head and holds them there with one hand while he pulls her shorts and underwear down with his other hand and with his leg pushed her shorts and underwear completely off. He then climbs between her legs and penetrates her. During this process she is telling him no and he is telling her to relax she will like it She is "freaking out" crying and scared while he is trying to kiss her and she is turning away She is wearing a long sleeve green knit shirt and blue jean shorts The shorts she later threw away do to being worn out Ayers ask her if she is on birth control and she replies no Ayers then withdraws his penis from her and ejaculates in his hand. He goes to the bathroom to clean up and she then goes to the bathroom and uses toilet paper to clean herself and she gets dressed states that they were at Ayers' residence approximately twenty to thirty minutes. He takes her to her car and nothing is said during the return trip to her car.
When inquired by the investigators as to why now to report the incident she stated that she recently (after the first week of January, specific date unknown) told Wayne (her live in boyfriend)
about the sex being forced. Wayne told that if she wanted to pursue it he would stand by her that something needs to be done with Deputy Ayers. Then asked about any contact with Deputy Ayers after the September 17th incident she states during this interview that she had several casual telephone conversations with him between September 17th and the time of the first pregnancy test…Case Number SE-14-0012.
Harvey Ayers accused of sexual assault
Harvey Ayers Evil and Corrupt
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 2
Sarasota County Commissioners
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 3
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 4
Harvey Ayers Ex Cop that crosses the line copy
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 5
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 6
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 7
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 8
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 9
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 10
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for Sexual Assault 11

AND YES, EVEN MORE DISTURBING BEHAVIOR BY HARVEY AYERS…YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS UP!

Harvey Ayers was reprimanded and ultimately suspended for losing his police issued .45 caliber firearm; while Ayers was on duty. And forced to reimburse the cost of the lost police issued firearm.
Harvey Ayers Reprimanded for losing his police 45 caliber firearm
http://harveyayers.com
Harvey Ayers Reprimanded for losing his police 45 caliber firearm 2
Harvey Ayers was investigated for the shooting death of a citizen and was later sued for wrongful death.
Harvey Ayers was investigated for the shooting death of a citizen
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…
Harvey Ayers was investigated for the shooting death of a citizen 2
NOTE ABOVE THE REPORT STATES ABOUT SHOTS HEARD AND REPORTED, they differ.
Harvey Ayers was investigated for the shooting death of a citizen 3
Harvey Ayers was reprimanded for permitting a County employee to drive home while intoxicated.
Harvey Ayers permitted a County employee to drive home while intoxicated.
Harvey Ayers was accused of police brutality.
Harvey Ayers was accused of police brutality.
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…Harvey Ayers was accused of police brutality 2
Harvey Ayers sordid history CONTINUED…Harvey Ayers was accused of police brutality 3
Harvey Ayers was disciplined for causing boldly harm to a citizen due to his negligence and carelessness.
Harvey Ayers was disciplined for negligence and carelessness
Harvey Ayers was disciplined for negligence and carelessness 2
Harvey Ayers resigned from Desoto County Sheriff’s Office on April 04, 2003.

From 2003 until 2012
Harvey Ayers found employment as a sworn Punta Gorda Police Officer and Detective. Public records obtained from the Punta Gorda Police Department reveal that Harvey Ayers was the subject of nearly 40 Internal Affairs Investigations:


Harvey Ayers was found to be untruthful in at least three sustained violations for attempting to cover up his misconduct and allowing a civilian observer ride along to yield a firearm while participating in the search of a school and a vehicle, placing citizens, other officers and the observer in life threatening danger.
Harvey Ayers was found to be untruthful
Harvey Ayers was reprimanded for conduct unbecoming of a Punta Gorda Police Officer for engaging in a SEXUAL ACTIVITY WHILE ON DUTY!
Harvey Ayers for Sexual Relations while on Duty
Harvey Ayers while on duty, allowed a prisoner to escape due to his negligence, placing the community in danger.
Harvey Ayers allowed a prisoner to escape
Harvey Ayers; while laughing in the presence of witnesses, referred to a young mentally challenged boy as a "RETARD”, then attempted to defend and diminish his behavior.
Harvey Ayers called a young mentally challenged boy a RETARD
Harvey Ayers abused his authority by intimidating and coercing a citizen into destroying property that was not illegal.
Harvey Ayers abused his authority
Harvey Ayers intimidated a disabled veteran into allowing Ayers to perform an illegal search where no evidence that a crime had ever been committed.
Harvey Ayers intimidated a disabled veteran
Harvey Ayers intimidated a disabled veteran 2
Harvey Ayers was reprimanded for watching pornographic videos with a female co-worker, while on duty in a police cruiser.
Harvey Ayers watching pornographic videos with a female co-worker in a police cruiser
Harvey Ayers mishandled seized narcotics. Harvey Ayers conducted an illegal search and seizure resulting in the State Attorney’s Office dropping drug charges on a suspect.
Harvey Ayers conducted illegal search and seizure 2
Harvey Ayers illegally frisked a female civilian driver without her consent.
Harvey Ayers conducted illegal search and seizure
Harvey Ayers was investigated for illegal search and seizure and harassment of an African American female.
Harvey Ayers illegally frisked a female
Harvey Ayers was required to attend a mandatory course in Bias and Base Profiling.
Harvey Ayers was required to attend Bias and Base Profiling.
In August 2012, after many investigations of Harvey Ayers by Punta Gorda Chief of Police Albert Arenal fired Harvey Ayers after a lengthy investigation into Ayer’s misconduct; including lying and being untruthful, which attracted local media attention; Fox Channel 4 News, NBC News and the Sarasota Herald Tribune and others.
Harvey Ayers fired
Harvey Ayers fired 2
Harvey Ayers was sued on at least 5 occasions in Federal and State Courts for violations of citizen’s civil rights:

Charles Lee Thomas v. Punta Gorda, Harvey Ayers (False Arrest without probable cause).

Anton Rashad Blandin vs. Charlotte County, Harvey Ayers (Police Brutality).

Scott Weinerth vs. Harvey Ayers, City of Punta Gorda (False Arrest).

Vierginia Artubel vs. Colonial Bank Group (Unlawful search and seizure, perjury, malicious prosecution).

Joshual L. Neal vs. Punta Gorda Police Department/
Harvey Ayers, (Indifference to Police Brutality).
Unbelievably, Harvey Ayers then brought his abusive, reckless, untruthful, harassing, bullying and intimidating tactics to Sarasota County, where he was hired as a code enforcement officer. Public records obtained from Sarasota County employment record reveal the following:


Harvey Ayers purposefully mislead relevant information pertinent to his termination from the City of Punta Gorda Police Department on his Sarasota County application for employment. Contained in this packet and also his employment file.

Harvey Ayers lied on his Sarasota County job application as to whether he had a traffic ticket in the past 5 years, yet when Sarasota County was informed about his lie, they could care less and did absolutely nothing.
Harvey Ayers lied on his Sarasota County Employment Application
Sarasota County employment records indicate that officials obtained records from the Punta Gorda Police Department, thus, were aware of his sordid and dishonest history from public records they obtained, yet still hired Harvey Ayers from a pool of 8 candidates, even after they were fully aware of his lying and poor character.
Harvey Ayers Liar Dishonest
Harvey Ayers upon being hired by Sarasota County, was required to sign the Ethics/Oath stating he would be truthful in his capacity with Sarasota County.
Harvey Ayers swore that he would be truthful
Harvey Ayers swore that he would be truthful  2
Harvey Ayers swore that he would be truthful 3
Harvey Ayers violated his ethical agreement as a Sarasota County employee: On December 15, 2017 at an Administrative Hearing in front of a Special Magistrate, Harvey Ayers lied while under oath:


In a recent Administrative hearing and Under Oath, Harvey Ayers was questioned.

Sarasota County’s Oath is based on the
Florida Statute 90.605 “Do you swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that the evidence and testimony you are about to present is truthful?”

“Q: Does your position with Sarasota County Enforcement require honesty and integrity?

“A: (
Harvey Ayers) “Yes”.

“Q: In your years of public service; you are in a public service position right now am I correct? Have you ever been found to be dishonest?

“A: (Harvey Ayers) Pause…, “NO Sir!”.


Contractor: “Special Magistrate Meg Wittmer, I have substantial evidence that Mr. Harvey Ayers has told another untruthfulness or a lie whatever you want to call it.

I believe that the credibility of the witness is in question here and now I have two objections to
Mr. Ayers’ credibility, he has just lied and said he has never been dishonest.

The integrity of these proceedings and swearing under oath is vital to a proper defense, a proper prosecution of Sarasota County and when a witness makes a comment that he has never been dishonest which is now on the records and I have this
(referring to a large stack of public records and investigations into Harvey Ayers history) from the City of Punta Gorda, where he was found to be untruthful after more than 40 Internal Affairs Investigations, plus, plus, plus…”

“A: (Harvey Ayers) I have no problem answering any questions Your Honor, I can maybe clear this up”.

“A: (Harvey Ayers) Yes, Your Honor, I have not been dishonest, I have not ever been accused of or found to be perjured or false statements in my entire career in law enforcement or in code enforcement, I was ultimately terminated from the Punta Gorda Police Department yes, I did, but not for lying or for perjury or for false statements…they were policy violations… I have never been untruthful, I have no reason to lie and I am not going to lie today and I am going to be completely upfront and honest”. (See audio online at harveyayers.com).
Harvey Ayers Liar
Learn more, download documents and hear the actual audio at: HARVEYAYERS.com, also see Meg Wittmer’s web site, the special magistrate that committed ex-parte communications with the County attorney, who hears Harvey Ayers’ cases and always sides with County at http://megwittmer.com.

The system in Sarasota County Government is corrupt and broken and needs to change!


All documents contained herein have been obtained from legal Florida Public Records Requests under The Freedom of information Act and Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes; from Desoto County Sheriff’s Office, City of Punta Gorda Police Department and also from the Sarasota County Government employee records for Harvey John Ayers that reveals that Sarasota County was fully aware of his sordid past prior to him being hired (much of these documents are in his employment file) by Sarasota County, yet they still hired Harvey Ayers.


Harvey Ayers
Sarasota County
Code Corruption



Brian Keisacker works for Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. in Sarasota, Florida.

Question: if a lawyer, namely Brian Keisacker in this case who works for the law firm of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. does not know what due process is, ignores the legal doctrine of a meaningful opportunity to be heard, did not giving proper notice to a litigant before issuing a ruling stated notice was given when it wasn’t that was overturned by the Circuit Court and who serves on a local Sarasota County contractor board illegally as a consumer representative in violation of the ordinance then what was the purpose of going to law school at Stetson Law School? Is Brian Keisacker of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. untrained? Is Brian Keisacker that corrupt and one sided? Is Brian Keisacker purposefully ignorant to the law? Or is he corrupt? You decide and ask yourself, would you even dream about hiring Brian Keisacker of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. for any reason after discovering who he is? All the above are supported by the facts!

It is our beliefs from personal experiences with lawyer Brian David Keisacker, who works for the law firm of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. that Brian Keisacker has violated Respondent’s constitution rights where Brian D. Keisacker as chairman of the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board did not accord due process guaranteed under the United States Constitution and served as a consumer representative, Brian Keisacker is in clear violation of Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3), where Brian Keisacker earns income from the construction industry.
Yet Brian Keisacker refuses to follow the law:

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney whose name is Brian D. Keisacker.

Brian Keisacker works for the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., and is UNETHICAL.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is a SCHEMER.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who ILLEGALLY serving on a construction board.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is DEFIANT.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is CALLOUS.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian D. Keisacker who is DELIBERATELY INDIFFERENT.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is will continue to WRECK THE LIVES OF THOSE HE JUDGES IN HIS OWN HYPOCRISY.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who has a SMUG ARROGANCE.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who has VIOLATED THIS AUTHOR’S CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is UNQUALIFIED.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian David Keisacker who is WITHOUT A MORAL COMPASS AND HAS TAKEN THE UNETHICAL PATH AS AN ATTORNEY IN PURSUIT OF POWER, INFLUENCE AND GREED.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who' s BEHAVIOR IS UNACCEPTABLE, UNPROFESSIONAL AND BLATANT VIOLATION OF THE LAW.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who has displayed PROHIBITED MISCONDUCT EXHIBITED BY BRIAN KEISACKER.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who displays CALLOUS INDIFFERENCE.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who does NOT CARE ABOUT THE LAW.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is NOT THE PROFESSIONAL ONE MIGHT EXPECT.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is VIOLATING THE LAW.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is ARROGANT.

BRIAN KEISACKER



BRIAN KEISACKER

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is SELF SERVING.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is UNTRUSTWORTHY.

Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., employs an attorney Brian Keisacker who is again, UNETHICAL!
Brian David Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Immoral.

Brian D. Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Unprofessional

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Defiant

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has No Integrity

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Arrogant

Brian David Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Not Trustworthy

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Unethical

Brian D. Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is Adverse

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has No Scruples.

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., Lacks Integrity.

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is unworthy adjective dishonest, or morally wrong

Brian D. Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is sketchy adjective informal dishonest or not reliable

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., Is conniving: adjective dishonest in a clever way, especially in order to get something that you want or in order to harm someone

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., Has exhibited Illegal Behavior.

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., Is Unqualified to serve on the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board

Brian D. Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is DANGEROUS.

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is DISHONEST

Brian David Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is IMMORAL

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is ARROGANT

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., is POMPOUS

Brian Keisacker works for the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has violated Rule # 4-8(d) governing the Florida Bar as follows:

(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic;

Brian Keisacker works for the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has been instrumental in violating constitutional rights and complicit in committing a due process violations.

Brian David Keisacker works for the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has been complicit in injustice.

Brian Keisacker of the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., has violated due process and a meaningful opportunity to be heard in several cases.

Brian Keisacker works for the law firm Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A.: The law is the law and Brian Keisacker has purposefully violated Section 22-127(3) of the Sarasota County Ordinance, Brian Keisacker, Shame on BRIAN KEISACKER!

  • The content of this website is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which are beliefs based on personal experiences with Brian Keisacker as well as the law; and court orders issued by the Circuit Court. Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3) which Brian Keisacker has willingly and purposefully violated by serving on the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board as a consumer representative, which states... “The citizen at large member shall be selected for appointment from Sarasota County resident applicants deriving no income from any source connected with the construction industry. “ Thus Brian Keisacker has, and clearly and willfully violating the law, ethics and his credibility, etc.

  • Florida Statute 489.131(10) “...The consumer representative may be any resident of the local jurisdiction who is not, and has never been, a member or practitioner of a profession regulated by the board or a member of any closely related profession.” Brian Keisacker is a construction attorney who works for the law firm of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A., and represents dozens of clients in matters that are directly related to the construction industry.


  • “Prepare and file pleadings, motions, and responses to all aspects civil litigation in areas including foreclosure, boundary disputes, construction defects…”

  • A lawyer (Brian Keisacker) who has willfully violated ethics and clearly established law is not trustworthy and is in fact unethical and unprofessional. The opinions stated herein are supported by the law, the facts and personal experiences and are protected under free speech per the First Amendment of the United States of America.
  • The law firm of Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. are not the target of these remarks. They are only being pointed out as to where Brian David Keisacker (Florida Bar number 12156) currently works.

  • Brian David Keisacker (attorney, lawyer) works for Ulrich, Scarlett, Wickman & Dean, PA,713 S Orange Ave Ste 201 Sarasota, FL 34236-7755. The phone number for Ulrich, Scarlet, Wickman & Dean, P.A. is 941-955-5100. Brian Keisacker’s phone number is 941-704-6735.
brian-keisacker-unethical-behavior-3
BRIAN KEISACKER

unethical-lawyer-brian-keisacker

BRIAN KEISACKER

brian-keisacker-unethical-3

BRIAN KEISACKER

brian-keisacker-caution-2
BRIAN KEISACKER

brian-keisacker-ethics-
BRIAN KEISACKER
brian-keisacker-ignorance-of-the-law
BRIAN KEISACKER

brian-keisacker-ignorance-of-the-law-666
BRIAN KEISACKER
brian-keisacker-ethics

BRIAN KEISACKER


brian-keisacker-mistake-of-law-copy
BRIAN KEISACKER
brian-keisacker-is-deceitful

BRIAN KEISACKER

brian-keisacker-no-morals

BRIAN KEISACKER



BRIAN KEISACKER